Prostituting Science: NASA's Hanson is the Father of Global Warming, Not Al Gore!

I have taken the time to research and find the first dissertation written by James Hanson, the NASA whack job who started this whole Global Warming farce and have concluded that his credibility should be called to question.

After deciphering his “Greenhouse Effects due to Man-Made Perturbations of Trace Gases”, published on November 12, 1976, he makes very little reference to the effect of CO2 on the Earth’s climate. (If you would like to read along, please click http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1976/1976_Wang_etal.pdf to download your own copy.)

In fact, he goes into great depth about Nitrous Oxide, Methane, and Ammonia instead, and blames global warming on the Farmers and the over use of fertilizers in the 1970’s.

If I recall from back then, wasn’t the big push to reduce fertilizers and aerosol spray cans that emitted high amounts of fluorocarbons that were responsible for the destruction of the Ozone?

And, wasn’t it trendy back then to scare the world into thinking that there was a huge hole in the ozone above the South Pole and that all of earth’s atmosphere was ultimately going to leak into space through this hole?

In his article, he makes reference to both Mars and Venus, and the fact that those to planets are lacking a sustainable atmosphere. He goes on to elude that Earth, like these two sister planets, would end up like them as a result of Green House Gasses.

Isn’t it odd, that back in the 70’s, scientists were heavily focused on both Mars and that Venus was studied more than the surface of Earth? And likewise, isn’t it odd that the atmosphere of Venus is made up of 97% CO2? And, isn’t it convenient that he references these two planets since they were buzz words during that time era? Yet, if one were to look at Venus, Earth, and Mars, you could easily conclude that Earth is very different than both of them simply because we have green vegetation, water, and life, and the other two don’t?

So that which makes Earth different is exactly what makes earth’s future different. Hanson would lead you to believe that Earth is doomed just like Venus and Mars. Yet, all three planets were formed at the same time, and Earth is the only one of the three that has human life.

Earth therefore doesn’t have the same fate in its future as Venus and Mars. Period. But how convenient for scientists like Hanson to use these planets as an example of what will happen to earth if we don’t take the “last chance we have” to correct Earth’s future.

And what ever happened to that huge hole in the Ozone that was discovered back in 1985? Nobody ever talks about that anymore because it would be inconvenient with regards to the CO2 crisis. After all, CO2 would actually evacuate the Earth and solve the CO2 emission problem for good. That would not work with Al Gore’s agenda now would it?

How convenient was it that the “hole” in the ozone was above the south pole, where relatively few researchers could ever travel to in order to debunk its existence? Travel to the South Pole is expensive, let alone grueling, and most atmospheric scientists would hesitate to venture there anyway. I for one was fooled, and my now obsolete collection of sun block can’t be used for much more than cooking grease.

Seems that there is at least one group of people that these scientific discoveries benefit – Prostitutes. Every time we come up with a new earth killing theory, the Scientific community finds a need to have a worldwide convention on the matter. Scientists, who otherwise spend their entire lives in labs, have their one opportunity to travel to far off lands where they can meet with other introverts and spend their hard earned cash on hookers.

Just as Hanson was able to conclude that Earth was doomed because of the minuscule amount of CO2 in our atmosphere, one could easily deduct that hookers prosper in the wake of discovery!